Labaree, Robert V. "The Regulation Of Hate Speech On College Campuses And The Library Bill Of Rights." Journal Of Academic Librarianship 19.6 (1994): 372. Academic Search Complete. Web. 6 Nov. 2014.
Hatfield, Katherine L., Kellie Schafer, and Kristopher A. Stroup. "A Dialogic Approach To Combating Hate Speech On College Campuses." Atlantic Journal Of Communication 13.1 (2005): 41-55. Academic Search Complete. Web. 6 Nov. 2014. "Handling Hate Speech." Magna's Campus Legal Monthly 21.7 (2006): 3. Academic Search Complete. Web. 9 Nov. 2014. Tsesis, Alexander. Destructive Messages: How Hate Speech Paves the Way for Harmful Social Movements. New York: New York UP, 2002. Print. Marcus, Laurence R. Fighting Words: The Politics of Hateful Speech. Westport, Conn: Praeger, 1996. Print. Whillock, Rita Kirk., and David Slayden. Hate Speech. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 1995. Print. Herz, Michael E., and Peter Molnar. The Content and Context of Hate Speech: Rethinking Regulation and Responses. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2012. Print. |
Labaree explores the origins of hate speech policies on college campuses, dissecting the roots of the issue and explaining how college administrations deal with them accordingly. This source will prove useful to me when crafting a proposed solution to the problem of hate speech on college campuses.
This research article investigates the blurred line between hate speech and tolerated speech. When reading this article, I find myself asking, at what point does my speech become hate speech? By the end of the article, Hatfield has attempted to answer this question in as holistic a way as possible. This article will be useful in my attempt to outline what exactly Emory University is aiming to combat. This source offers several different examples of how universities have dealt with issues surrounding hate speech in the past. These examples will prove useful to me when brainstorming ways that Emory can combat on-campus anonymous hate speech. Tsesis recalls ways in which hate speech has sparked dangerous national sentiments. I can use this source to stress the importance of shifting the campus' culture towards hate speech. Hatred is seen as an almost accepted, expected, everyday part of on-campus life. This article stresses the importance of eliminating hate speech as an option. Marcus approaches the problem of hate speech by first addressing a campus' "climate" towards hate. He then explains how to regulate this speech, making it clear that it is impossible to completely disseminate all hatred on campus. I found this source to be extremely useful because it stresses the idea of minimizing hate speech, while knowing it will always still exist in some form. The term "rhetorical extremism" is used throughout the book, as Whillock and Slayden explain how hate speech ruins several different types of social movements. I can use this source to explain how hate speech on Emory's campus impedes the efforts of students actively seeking change. Herz and Molnar attempt to rethink the regulation and response towards hate speech. I can use this book to brainstorm ways to regulate on-campus hate speech. |